On 18:18 Thu 17 Dec , Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> It might be faster but it would mean a bigger change. It looks like having
> the dgid or p_pr structures in some internal opensm structure to carry that
> information along would be best but that is a lot of work.
Actually now dgid parameter is neve
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:29:43 -0500
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> >
>> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
>> > b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
>> > index be0cd
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:29:43 -0500
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
> > b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
> > index be0cd71..1fa83a1 100644
> > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:59:11 -0500
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> > The follow on would be that if they specify a
>> > DGID in the PathRecord query and the result is subnet loc
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:59:11 -0500
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
[snip]
>
> > The follow on would be that if they specify a
> > DGID in the PathRecord query and the result is subnet local they must still
> > use a GRH even if the packet is going to
