On Monday 08 February 2010 05:21:50 you wrote:
Octavian Purdila wrote:
On Friday 05 February 2010 06:45:38 you wrote:
Again, using bitmap algorithm is not a problem and it's better, the
problem is sysctl interface, how would you plan to interact with users
via sysctl/proc if you use
On Friday 05 February 2010 06:45:38 you wrote:
Again, using bitmap algorithm is not a problem and it's better, the
problem is sysctl interface, how would you plan to interact with users
via sysctl/proc if you use bitmap to handle this? I would like to hear
more details about this.
We could
From: Octavian Purdila opurd...@ixiacom.com
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:15:51 +0200
int inet_is_reserved_local_port(int port)
{
if (test_bit(port, reserved_ports))
return 1;
return 0;
}
In theory it might be slower because of the reserved_ports bitmap will have a
From: Tetsuo Handa penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 06:45:28 +0900
Octavian Purdila wrote:
int inet_is_reserved_local_port(int port)
{
if (test_bit(port, reserved_ports))
return 1;
return 0;
}
Above check is exactly what I'm doing in the
Octavian Purdila wrote:
On Friday 05 February 2010 02:41:12 you wrote:
David Miller wrote:
Octavian Purdila wrote:
int inet_is_reserved_local_port(int port)
{
if (test_bit(port, reserved_ports))
return 1;
return 0;
}
Above check is exactly what I'm doing in
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Amerigo Wang amw...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within
Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Amerigo Wang amw...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 06:30:07 you wrote:
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within ip_local_port_range.
This only
Octavian Purdila wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 06:30:07 you wrote:
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within ip_local_port_range.
This only affects the applications which call socket functions
like
Le mardi 02 février 2010 à 23:30 -0500, Amerigo Wang a écrit :
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within ip_local_port_range.
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 02 février 2010 à 23:30 -0500, Amerigo Wang a écrit :
This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
port numbers within
12 matches
Mail list logo
