On 18:18 Thu 17 Dec , Ira Weiny wrote:
It might be faster but it would mean a bigger change. It looks like having
the dgid or p_pr structures in some internal opensm structure to carry that
information along would be best but that is a lot of work.
Actually now dgid parameter is never
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:29:43 -0500
Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:29:43 -0500
Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
index be0cd71..1fa83a1 100644
---
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:59:11 -0500
Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
[snip]
The follow on would be that if they specify a
DGID in the
Ira,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
Sasha, Hal,
I have found that the following patch caused our SRP connected storage to
break.
What is causing the SRP target to fail ? Is it a non zero hop limit
returned in the SA PathRecord ?
patch:
Hi Ira,
On 16:43 Mon 14 Dec , Ira Weiny wrote:
I have found that the following patch caused our SRP connected storage to
break.
patch: 3d20f82edd3246879063b77721d0bcef927bdc48
opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c: separate router guid resolution code
Move off subnet
On 10:16 Tue 15 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
patch: 3d20f82edd3246879063b77721d0bcef927bdc48
opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c: separate router guid resolution code
Move off subnet destination (router address) resolution code to separate
function to improve readability.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:16:42 -0500
Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ira,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
Sasha, Hal,
I have found that the following patch caused our SRP connected storage to
break.
What is causing the SRP target to
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:18:19AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:15:32 -0700
Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
However, I don't understand the comment Only set HopLimit if going
through a
router?
This is from '#ifdef ROUTER_EXP' days -
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:16:42 -0500
Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ira,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov wrote:
Sasha, Hal,
I have found that the following patch caused our SRP
Sasha, Hal,
I have found that the following patch caused our SRP connected storage to
break.
patch: 3d20f82edd3246879063b77721d0bcef927bdc48
opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c: separate router guid resolution code
Move off subnet destination (router address) resolution code to separate
11 matches
Mail list logo