Hi,
On 07 April 2016 20:14, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 10:00 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>
> > Hey Sergei,
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
>
> You're welcome. :-)
>
> > On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 02:15 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >> On 04/06/2016 03:52 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> >>
From: Wolfram Sang
The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate, so we should check the result before
using it as a divisor.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov
---
The
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 16:21 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/06, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 15:11 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >
> > > CC Mike, Stephen, linux-clk (this time with the new Mike)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Sjoerd Simons
> > >
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> This reverts commit 19417bd9c5112f58ea63e97ba72edabd5e1cc0fe as
> according to
> http://elinux.org/File:R-CarM2-KOELSCH_PORTER-B_PORTER_C_Comparison.pdf
> the external oscilator for SCIF_CLK is not mounted on the porter boards.
>
>