Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: Remove extra LVDS port label

2017-07-31 Thread Simon Horman
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:05:50PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Monday 17 Jul 2017 10:07:33 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > The DU LVDS output is on port 3 on R8A7795 but on port 2 on R8A7796. The > > > lvds_connecto

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: Remove extra LVDS port label

2017-07-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Simon, On Monday 17 Jul 2017 10:07:33 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > The DU LVDS output is on port 3 on R8A7795 but on port 2 on R8A7796. The > > lvds_connector label thus can't be defined in salvator-common.dtsi, > > common to the two S

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: Remove extra LVDS port label

2017-07-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > The DU LVDS output is on port 3 on R8A7795 but on port 2 on R8A7796. The > lvds_connector label thus can't be defined in salvator-common.dtsi, > common to the two SoCs. > > The lvds_connector label is meant for convience to be referenced f

[PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: Remove extra LVDS port label

2017-07-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
The DU LVDS output is on port 3 on R8A7795 but on port 2 on R8A7796. The lvds_connector label thus can't be defined in salvator-common.dtsi, common to the two SoCs. The lvds_connector label is meant for convience to be referenced from panel device tree files, such as r8a77xx-aa104xd12-panel.dtsi o