On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 09:16:51AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Simon Horman
> > wrote:
> > > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> >
> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:54:15AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:47:36PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:07:13AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:47:36PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:07:13AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>
> This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
>
Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
ARCH_RENESAS should cover