Re: [PATCH 1/3] sh_eth: rename EESIPR bits

Hello! On 01/23/2017 10:39 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Since the commit b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth") the *enum* declaring the EESIPR bits (interrupt mask) went out of sync with the *enum* declaring the EESR bits (interrupt status) WRT bit naming and

Re: [PATCH 1/3] sh_eth: rename EESIPR bits

Hi Sergei, On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Since the commit b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth") > the *enum* declaring the EESIPR bits (interrupt mask) went out of sync with > the *enum* declaring the EESR bits

[PATCH 1/3] sh_eth: rename EESIPR bits

Since the commit b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth") the *enum* declaring the EESIPR bits (interrupt mask) went out of sync with the *enum* declaring the EESR bits (interrupt status) WRT bit naming and formatting. I'd like to restore the consistency by using EESIPR as the