Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: stub: use pr_fmt

2017-06-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:21:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Instead of hard coding "i2c-stub:", let's use the pr_fmt mechanism to > achieve the same more easily. This makes it easier to stay consistent > when adding new messages. Also, remove an unneeded OOM message while we > are here. > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: stub: use pr_fmt

2017-05-18 Thread Jean Delvare
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:21:05 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Instead of hard coding "i2c-stub:", let's use the pr_fmt mechanism to > achieve the same more easily. This makes it easier to stay consistent > when adding new messages. Also, remove an unneeded OOM message while we > are here. > >

[PATCH 2/2] i2c: stub: use pr_fmt

2017-05-16 Thread Wolfram Sang
Instead of hard coding "i2c-stub:", let's use the pr_fmt mechanism to achieve the same more easily. This makes it easier to stay consistent when adding new messages. Also, remove an unneeded OOM message while we are here. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang ---