Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM / Domains: Take WAKEUP_PATH driver flag into account in genpd

On 15 December 2017 at 16:56, Ulf Hansson wrote: > In case the WAKEUP_PATH flag has been set in a later phase than from the > ->suspend() callback, the PM core want set the ->power.wakeup_path status /s/want/don't If another version is needed I fix, else perhaps you can

[PATCH 3/3] PM / Domains: Take WAKEUP_PATH driver flag into account in genpd

In case the WAKEUP_PATH flag has been set in a later phase than from the ->suspend() callback, the PM core want set the ->power.wakeup_path status flag for the device. Therefore, let's be safe and check it explicitly. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ---