Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

Hi Ulf, On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 28 June 2016 at 18:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> This patch (commit eb13a0a1b6d5d5c2 in pm/linux-next) breaks resume on > > Thanks for reporting! > >> sh73a0/kzm9g and

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

Hi Kevin, On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> When the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() helpers were invented, we still

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

Hi Geert, Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Ulf, Rafael, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> When the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() helpers were invented, we still >> had CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP as separate

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

On 28 June 2016 at 18:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Ulf, Rafael, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> When the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() helpers were invented, we still >> had CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 06:26:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Ulf, Rafael, > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > When the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() helpers were invented, we still > > had CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP as

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PM / Runtime: Defer resuming of the device in pm_runtime_force_resume()

Hi Ulf, Rafael, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > When the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() helpers were invented, we still > had CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP as separate Kconfig options. > > To make sure these helpers worked for all