Hi Wolfram,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> BTW, we also have this on Koelsch:
>
> sh-pfc e606.pin-controller: pin GP_7_23 already requested by
> ee09.pci; cannot claim for e659.usb
>
> because pci0 and hsusb use the same pinctrl-0. Known
> I2C4 on Koelsch uses pins GP7_13/14 (group "i2c4_c"), not GP4_13/14
> (group "i2c4").
Confirmed and fixed, thanks Geert! I updated my error catching scripts
and will redo the other tests, too.
BTW, we also have this on Koelsch:
sh-pfc e606.pin-controller: pin GP_7_23 already requested by
Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> Make it possible to fallback to GPIO for I2C4 on the EXIO-E connector.
>
> This is based on reference work for the I2C0 core of the lager/r8a7790
> by Wolfram Sang.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon
Make it possible to fallback to GPIO for I2C4 on the EXIO-E connector.
This is based on reference work for the I2C0 core of the lager/r8a7790
by Wolfram Sang.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
[wsa: rebased, fixed aliases, switched to named GPIOS]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram