Hi Ulf,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 6:19:06 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:34:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 6:19:06 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:34:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > And Samsung.
> >> > Shall I create the immutable branch now?
> >>
> >>
Hi Arnd,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:34:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > And Samsung.
>> > Shall I create the immutable branch now?
>>
>> Arnd: are you happy with the new patches and changes?
>
> I still had some
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:34:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > And Samsung.
> > Shall I create the immutable branch now?
>
> Arnd: are you happy with the new patches and changes?
I still had some comments for patch 7, but that shouldn't stop
you from creating a branch for the
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> Some Renesas SoCs may exist in different revisions, providing slightly
>> different functionalities (e.g. R-Car
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Some Renesas SoCs may exist in different revisions, providing slightly
> different functionalities (e.g. R-Car H3 ES1.x and ES2.0), and behavior
> (errate and quirks). This needs to be catered for by drivers