On 20 April 2016 at 10:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson
>
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
> +
> +static bool rcar_sysc_activ
On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
+
+static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return tr
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + return true;
>>
>> I am interested to know why this is always returning true.
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>
> I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
> can elaborate a bit on that?
Too many copying from old
[...]
> +
> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return true;
I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
can elaborate a bit on that?
> +}
> +
> +static int rcar_sysc_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> + struc
Populate the SYSC PM domains from DT, based on the presence of a device
node for the System Controller. The actual power area hiearchy, and
features of specific areas are obtained from tables in the C code.
The SYSCIER and SYSCIMR register values are derived from the power areas
present, which wil