On 20 April 2016 at 10:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf
On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
+
+static bool
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>
> I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
> can elaborate a bit on that?
[...]
> +
> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return true;
I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
can elaborate a bit on that?
> +}
> +
> +static int rcar_sysc_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> +