Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] i2c: demux: Use changeset helpers for clarity

> > Why? ePAPR says "okay", "disabled", "fail", or "fail-sss". > > > > Sorry for missing this in the previous round. > > That was per Wolfram's request, and because the existing code uses "ok". I'm > personally fine with any. I did? Well, today I don't have a strong preference. Any is fine

Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] i2c: demux: Use changeset helpers for clarity

Hi Geert, On Thursday, 22 February 2018 11:26:44 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > From: Pantelis Antoniou > > > > The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of > > using the static

Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] i2c: demux: Use changeset helpers for clarity

Hi Laurent, On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > From: Pantelis Antoniou > > The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of > using the static property. > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis

[PATCH v5 6/8] i2c: demux: Use changeset helpers for clarity

From: Pantelis Antoniou The changeset helpers are easier to use, use them instead of using the static property. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou Acked-by: Wolfram Sang ["okay" -> "ok"] Signed-off-by: Laurent