Hi Niklas,
On Friday, 8 December 2017 15:09:21 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> On 2017-12-08 09:54:31 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 8 December 2017 03:08:17 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
> >> be unregistered
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your comments.
On 2017-12-08 09:54:31 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 8 December 2017 03:08:17 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
> > be
Hi Hans,
On Friday, 8 December 2017 10:46:34 EET Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 08:54 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 8 December 2017 03:08:17 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
> >> be unregistered when the
On 12/08/2017 08:54 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 8 December 2017 03:08:17 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
>> be unregistered when the driver is removed.
>
> The
Hi Niklas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday, 8 December 2017 03:08:17 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
> be unregistered when the driver is removed.
The .remove() operation indicates device removal, not driver removal (or,
If the video device was registered by the complete() callback it should
be unregistered when the driver is removed. Protect from printing an
uninitialized video device node name by adding a check in
rvin_v4l2_unregister() to identify that the video device is registered.
Signed-off-by: Niklas
