Re: [RFC 2/3] mmc: host: tmio: SDIO_STATUS_QUIRK is rather SDIO_STATUS_SETBITS

2017-01-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ > > /* > > * Some controllers needs to set 1 on SDIO status reserved bits > > */ > > Is the following update to the above appropriate? > In particular, is it some or all? Some. > * Controllers

Re: [RFC 2/3] mmc: host: tmio: SDIO_STATUS_QUIRK is rather SDIO_STATUS_SETBITS

2017-01-10 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:43:25PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > QUIRK sounds like there is something wrong, but actually there are just > some bits which need to be 1. Rename it to be more clear. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- >

[RFC 2/3] mmc: host: tmio: SDIO_STATUS_QUIRK is rather SDIO_STATUS_SETBITS

2017-01-05 Thread Wolfram Sang
QUIRK sounds like there is something wrong, but actually there are just some bits which need to be 1. Rename it to be more clear. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c | 6 ++ drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c | 2 +-