Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-10-18 Thread Keerthy
On Friday 21 September 2018 04:26 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Thanks looks nice to me: >> >> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren > > Thanks, Tony! Hi Wolfram Sang, Posted: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1001457/ Thanks for the series! I tested for poweroff on am572x-idk. Tested-by: Keerthy

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-09-23 Thread Stefan Lengfeld
Hi Wolfram, On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > To keep the discussion about master_xfer_irqless going, I post here a > draft how I envision the changes to the I2C core. They are only build > tested. I am unsure if I can test them on hardware before next week, so >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-09-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > To keep the discussion about master_xfer_irqless going, I post here a > draft how I envision the changes to the I2C core. They are only build > tested. I am unsure if I can test them on hardware before next week, so > I'll send them

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-09-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Thanks looks nice to me: > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren Thanks, Tony! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-09-20 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Wolfram Sang [180920 09:19]: > To keep the discussion about master_xfer_irqless going, I post here a > draft how I envision the changes to the I2C core. They are only build > tested. I am unsure if I can test them on hardware before next week, so > I'll send them around as RFC already, so

[RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: introduce master_xfer_irqless

2018-09-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
To keep the discussion about master_xfer_irqless going, I post here a draft how I envision the changes to the I2C core. They are only build tested. I am unsure if I can test them on hardware before next week, so I'll send them around as RFC already, so people can get an idea and comment. Maybe