On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Although the I2C IP found in the RZ/G1C is not exactly the same
> as the one found in the R-Car Gen2 family or R-Car Gen3 family,
> it can still be considered as compatible with R-Car Gen2 from
> a software perpective.
> This patch
Hello Wolfram,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: rcar: Add r8a77470 support
>
>
> > > It seems to me that the RZ/G1C has some extra registers described
> > > for I2C when compared with both other RZ/G1 and R-Car Gen2 SoCs.
> >
> > Exactly. The ex
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > It seems to me that the RZ/G1C has some extra registers described
> > > for I2C when compared with both other RZ/G1 and R-Car Gen2 SoCs.
> >
> > Exactly. The extra registers found with the RZ/G1C I2C controller are
> > also
> > It seems to me that the RZ/G1C has some extra registers described
> > for I2C when compared with both other RZ/G1 and R-Car Gen2 SoCs.
>
> Exactly. The extra registers found with the RZ/G1C I2C controller are
> also found in R-Car Gen3, but the driver doesn't handle them. R-Car
> Gen3 has
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:10:53AM +, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: rcar: Add r8a77470 support
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
&
Hello Simon,
Thank you for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: rcar: Add r8a77470 support
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > Although the I2C IP found in the RZ/G1C is not exactly the same
> > as the one found in
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Although the I2C IP found in the RZ/G1C is not exactly the same
> as the one found in the R-Car Gen2 family or R-Car Gen3 family,
> it can still be considered as compatible with R-Car Gen2 from
> a software perpective.
> This patch
