Hi Marek,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 05/26/2018 11:16 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help
Hi Marek,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 05/23/2018 01:55 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all
>> variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always
>> the same. Replace that with a
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all
> variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always
> the same. Replace that with a separate identifier instead, which
> allows us to discern
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 01:42:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all
> variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always
> the same. Replace that with a separate identifier instead, which
Acked-by: Mark Brown