On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Laurent and Simon,
>
> On 2019-04-20 02:30:49 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Niklas,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:46:28PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > > On 2019-03-13 11:51:18 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> >
Hi Laurent and Simon,
On 2019-04-20 02:30:49 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:46:28PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > On 2019-03-13 11:51:18 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > The ports node of vin4 only has one sub-node and thus does
> > > not need #add
Hi Niklas,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:46:28PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> On 2019-03-13 11:51:18 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > The ports node of vin4 only has one sub-node and thus does
> > not need #address-cells/#size-cells and the sub-node does
> > not need an exit.
>
> I agree that the
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your patch.
On 2019-03-13 11:51:18 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> The ports node of vin4 only has one sub-node and thus does
> not need #address-cells/#size-cells and the sub-node does
> not need an exit.
I agree that the warning should be silenced however I have a feeling
th
The ports node of vin4 only has one sub-node and thus does
not need #address-cells/#size-cells and the sub-node does
not need an exit.
This addresses the following warning:
# make dtbs W=1
...
arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts:492.8-503.4: Warning
(graph_child_address): /soc/vide
