On Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 24/03/17 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On 22/03/17 17:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
> > > power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
> >
On 24/03/17 16:42, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 22/03/17 17:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
slight changes in semantics.
If a gpiochip doesn't implement
On 22/03/17 17:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
slight changes in semantics.
If a gpiochip doesn't implement the optional .get_direction() callback,
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 18:21 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
> power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
> slight changes in semantics.
>
> If a gpiochip doesn't implement the optional
On 03/22/2017 07:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
slight changes in semantics.
If a gpiochip doesn't implement the optional .get_direction() callback,
Commit 7613c922315e308a ("backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial
power state to a separate function") not just moved some code, but made
slight changes in semantics.
If a gpiochip doesn't implement the optional .get_direction() callback,
gpiod_get_direction always returns -EINVAL, which
