On 11 February 2016 at 14:32, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:00:50AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 11 February 2016 at 01:07, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> >> I suspect you are using a delayed work in this driver to deal with
>> >> request timeouts.
>> >>
>> >> The value for the dela
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:00:50AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 11 February 2016 at 01:07, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> I suspect you are using a delayed work in this driver to deal with
> >> request timeouts.
> >>
> >> The value for the delay that is used, needs to be informed towards the
> >> mmc
On 11 February 2016 at 01:07, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> I suspect you are using a delayed work in this driver to deal with
>> request timeouts.
>>
>> The value for the delay that is used, needs to be informed towards the
>> mmc core via the "->max_busy_timeout".
>
> Shouldn't that be a seperate patch
> I suspect you are using a delayed work in this driver to deal with
> request timeouts.
>
> The value for the delay that is used, needs to be informed towards the
> mmc core via the "->max_busy_timeout".
Shouldn't that be a seperate patch? In patch 9, I add support for
another SoC. But your requ
On 10 February 2016 at 17:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> ^
>> I think you should try without MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY, and then check
>> that a following CMD13 command always states that the card isn't busy.
>> I think the best path to try this is when sending a big write data
>> request, as in that cas
^
> I think you should try without MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY, and then check
> that a following CMD13 command always states that the card isn't busy.
> I think the best path to try this is when sending a big write data
> request, as in that case you can be quite certain that the card gets
> busy betw
On 25 January 2016 at 20:15, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> Registers are 64bit apart, so we refactor bus_shift handling a little
> and set it based on the DT compatible. Also, EXT_ACC is different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ai Kyuse
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> ---
>
> @MMC maintaine
From: Wolfram Sang
Registers are 64bit apart, so we refactor bus_shift handling a little
and set it based on the DT compatible. Also, EXT_ACC is different.
Signed-off-by: Ai Kyuse
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
@MMC maintainers: I set the MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY flage here and it is needed
t
