> All other (non-VC5/6) devices on i2c4 currently described in DT are
> described in salvator-common.dtsi.
Yes, exactly, non-VC5/6. Now imagine we need to reduce the freq because
of a HW bug in only one of them...
But all fine with me. You can send a fixup patch if you want and add my
ack.
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-x.dtsi | 2 ++
>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-xs.dtsi | 2 ++
>>
>> Any reason this cannot be added to salvator-common.dtsi instead?
>
> It could be. For clarity, I wanted to
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-x.dtsi | 2 ++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-xs.dtsi | 2 ++
>
> Any reason this cannot be added to salvator-common.dtsi instead?
It could be. For clarity, I wanted to place this attribute to the
highest level and not somewhere inbetween.
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> From: Takeshi Kihara
>
> Any of the following devices connected to I2C ch4 of the Salvator-X(S)
> boards will operate at 400 kHz:
>
> PCA9654, 9FGV0841, ADV7482WBBCZ, MAX9611, 5P49V5923, 5P49V6901A
>
> This patch updates the
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:48:15PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:29:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > From: Takeshi Kihara
> >
> > Any of the following devices connected to I2C ch4 of the Salvator-X(S)
> > boards will operate at 400 kHz:
> >
> > PCA9654,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:29:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Takeshi Kihara
>
> Any of the following devices connected to I2C ch4 of the Salvator-X(S)
> boards will operate at 400 kHz:
>
> PCA9654, 9FGV0841, ADV7482WBBCZ, MAX9611, 5P49V5923, 5P49V6901A
>
> This patch updates the
From: Takeshi Kihara
Any of the following devices connected to I2C ch4 of the Salvator-X(S)
boards will operate at 400 kHz:
PCA9654, 9FGV0841, ADV7482WBBCZ, MAX9611, 5P49V5923, 5P49V6901A
This patch updates the clock frequency to 400 KHz.
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara
[wsa: squashed
