On 16 February 2017 at 09:37, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:57:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:57:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition when to
> >> > call mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() with checking if stop.resp[0] has one
On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition when to
>> > call mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() with checking if stop.resp[0] has one of the
>> > R1_* bits set which are marked with 'ex' (and probably 'erx',
Shimoda-san, Ulf,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:06:47AM +, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:04 AM
> >
> > After we received the dataend interrupt, R1 response register carries
> > the value