Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12

2017-02-16 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 16 February 2017 at 09:37, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:57:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> > >> >> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12

2017-02-16 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Ulf, On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:57:36AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition when to > >> > call mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() with checking if stop.resp[0] has one

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12

2017-02-15 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 15 February 2017 at 16:02, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > I see. Ulf, do you think it makes sense to extend the condition when to >> > call mmc_blk_cmd_recovery() with checking if stop.resp[0] has one of the >> > R1_* bits set which are marked with 'ex' (and probably 'erx',

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: host: tmio: fill in response from auto cmd12

2017-02-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
Shimoda-san, Ulf, On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:06:47AM +, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Hi, > > > From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:04 AM > > > > After we received the dataend interrupt, R1 response register carries > > the value