Hi Sergei,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
wrote:
> On 06/27/2016 12:41 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> From: Magnus Damm
>> Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU
>> is
Hello.
On 06/27/2016 12:41 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
From: Magnus Damm
Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU is
pointed out in the DTB via the enable-method. The ability to configure
the APMU via C code is still kept intact to
Hi Sergei,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 10:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
From: Magnus Damm
Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU is
Hello.
On 06/24/2016 10:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
From: Magnus Damm
Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU is
pointed out in the DTB via the enable-method. The ability to configure
the APMU via C code is still kept intact to
Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 01:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> From: Magnus Damm
>> Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU is
>> pointed out
From: Magnus Damm
Allow DT configuration of the APMU hardware in the case when the APMU is
pointed out in the DTB via the enable-method. The ability to configure
the APMU via C code is still kept intact to prevent DTB breakage for older
SoCs that do not rely on the