Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
> 'device' structure only allows devices to be associated with a
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:50:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Do not create a child node in SPI slave mode. Instead, add an
>>
Hi Geert,
On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>> not currently by the PM domain framework. Furthermore, the current Linux
Hi Jon,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/16 09:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Some devices may require more than one PM domain to operate and this is
>>> not
On 09/21/2016 03:00 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:25:37PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Hi Wolfram,
>>
>> On 09/20/2016 05:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> The core uses it for polling. Give drivers a proper define handle this
>>> case like for other response types.
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:58PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> Add the commit message.
Can do, but would be highly redundant with the subject. Ulf, you want
one, too?
>
> On 09/20/2016 05:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:35:00PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 05:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > We need to add R1 without CRC support, refactor the bus width routine a
> > little and extend a quirk check. To support "non-removable;" we need a
> > workaround which will be hopefully
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:49:04 PM CEST Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This series was initially sent to add support for two PCIe
> ports in dra7. This included selecting PCI_DOMAINS config
> in SOC_DRA7XX.
>
> However from the review, PCI_DOMAINS can instead be selected
> from