Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: renesas: rcar-gen3-cpg: add RPC clock

2018-11-27 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
On 11/23/2018 03:55 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>> Add the RPC clock for the R-Car gen3 SoCs -- this clock is controlled by
>> the RPCCKCR register on all the R-Car gen3 SoCs except V3M (R8A77970).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- renesas-drivers.orig/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-gen3-cpg.c
>> +++ renesas-drivers/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-gen3-cpg.c
>> @@ -409,6 +409,121 @@ free_clock:
>> return clk;
>>  }
>>
>> +#define CPG_RPC_CKSTP2 BIT(9)
> 
> This bit is for RPCD2, so technically it should be part of patch 3/4.
> Perhaps you can merge both patches, and absorb the non-SoC-specific
> parts from patch 4/4?

   Done!

>> +#define CPG_RPC_CKSTP  BIT(8)
>> +#define CPG_RPC_DIV_4_3_MASK   GENMASK(4, 3)
> 
> Unused

   I'd like to keep it for the sake of completeness...

>> +#define CPG_RPC_DIV_2_0_MASK   GENMASK(2, 0)
>> +
>> +struct rpc_clock {
>> +   struct clk_hw hw;
>> +   void __iomem *reg;
> 
> As this register should be saved/restore during system suspend/resume,
> you should add
> 
> struct cpg_simple_notifier csn;

   Done.

>> +};
> 
>> +static long cpg_rpc_clock_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> +unsigned long *parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +   struct rpc_clock *clock = to_rpc_clock(hw);
>> +   unsigned int div = cpg_rpc_clock_calc_div(clock, rate, *parent_rate);
>> +
>> +   return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, div);
> 
> Given you set CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, shouldn't you propagate up,
> cfr. drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c:clk_factor_round_rate()?

   Frankly speaking, I'm not sure when I should set that flag...

[...]
>> +static struct clk * __init cpg_rpc_clk_register(const struct cpg_core_clk 
>> *core,
>> +   void __iomem *base,
>> +   const char *parent_name)
>> +{
>> +   struct clk_init_data init;
>> +   struct rpc_clock *clock;
>> +   struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> +   clock = kzalloc(sizeof(*clock), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +   if (!clock)
>> +   return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +   init.name = core->name;
>> +   init.ops = _rpc_clock_ops;
>> +   init.flags = CLK_IS_BASIC | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> 
> I don't think CLK_IS_BASIC is appropriate?
> 
> #define CLK_IS_BASICBIT(5) /* Basic clk, can't do a to_clk_foo() 
> */

   I still haven't found where this bit is tested... and I got an impression 
everybody
just blindly copy it...

> 
>> +   init.parent_names = _name;
>> +   init.num_parents = 1;
>> +
>> +   clock->reg = base + CPG_RPCCKCR;
>> +   clock->hw.init = 
>> +
>> +   clk = clk_register(NULL, >hw);
>> +   if (IS_ERR(clk))
>> +   kfree(clock);
>> +
> 
> For save/restore during system suspend/resume:
> 
> cpg_simple_notifier_register(notifiers, >csn);

   Done.

> Hmm, looks like I missed that during review of commit 381081ffc2948e1e
> ("clk: renesas: r8a77970: Add SD0H/SD0 clocks for SDHI"), too.

   Want me to fix this?

[...]

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
> Geert

MBR, Sergei


Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: renesas: rcar-gen3-cpg: add RPC clock

2018-11-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Sergei,

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 7:41 PM Sergei Shtylyov
 wrote:
> Add the RPC clock for the R-Car gen3 SoCs -- this clock is controlled by
> the RPCCKCR register on all the R-Car gen3 SoCs except V3M (R8A77970).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

Thanks for your patch!

> --- renesas-drivers.orig/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-gen3-cpg.c
> +++ renesas-drivers/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-gen3-cpg.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,121 @@ free_clock:
> return clk;
>  }
>
> +#define CPG_RPC_CKSTP2 BIT(9)

This bit is for RPCD2, so technically it should be part of patch 3/4.
Perhaps you can merge both patches, and absorb the non-SoC-specific
parts from patch 4/4?

> +#define CPG_RPC_CKSTP  BIT(8)
> +#define CPG_RPC_DIV_4_3_MASK   GENMASK(4, 3)

Unused

> +#define CPG_RPC_DIV_2_0_MASK   GENMASK(2, 0)
> +
> +struct rpc_clock {
> +   struct clk_hw hw;
> +   void __iomem *reg;

As this register should be saved/restore during system suspend/resume,
you should add

struct cpg_simple_notifier csn;

> +};

> +static long cpg_rpc_clock_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> +   struct rpc_clock *clock = to_rpc_clock(hw);
> +   unsigned int div = cpg_rpc_clock_calc_div(clock, rate, *parent_rate);
> +
> +   return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, div);

Given you set CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, shouldn't you propagate up,
cfr. drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c:clk_factor_round_rate()?

> +}

> +static struct clk * __init cpg_rpc_clk_register(const struct cpg_core_clk 
> *core,
> +   void __iomem *base,
> +   const char *parent_name)
> +{
> +   struct clk_init_data init;
> +   struct rpc_clock *clock;
> +   struct clk *clk;
> +
> +   clock = kzalloc(sizeof(*clock), GFP_KERNEL);
> +   if (!clock)
> +   return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +   init.name = core->name;
> +   init.ops = _rpc_clock_ops;
> +   init.flags = CLK_IS_BASIC | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;

I don't think CLK_IS_BASIC is appropriate?

#define CLK_IS_BASICBIT(5) /* Basic clk, can't do a to_clk_foo() */

> +   init.parent_names = _name;
> +   init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> +   clock->reg = base + CPG_RPCCKCR;
> +   clock->hw.init = 
> +
> +   clk = clk_register(NULL, >hw);
> +   if (IS_ERR(clk))
> +   kfree(clock);
> +

For save/restore during system suspend/resume:

cpg_simple_notifier_register(notifiers, >csn);

Hmm, looks like I missed that during review of commit 381081ffc2948e1e
("clk: renesas: r8a77970: Add SD0H/SD0 clocks for SDHI"), too.

> +   return clk;
> +}
> +
>
>  static const struct rcar_gen3_cpg_pll_config *cpg_pll_config __initdata;
>  static unsigned int cpg_clk_extalr __initdata;
> @@ -583,6 +698,9 @@ struct clk * __init rcar_gen3_cpg_clk_re
> }
> break;
>
> +   case CLK_TYPE_GEN3_RPC:
> +   return cpg_rpc_clk_register(core, base, 
> __clk_get_name(parent));
> +
> default:
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds