Hello!

On 04/13/2018 05:10 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> Whitelisting every ES version does not scale. So, we whitelist whole
> SoCs independent of ES version. If we need specific handling for an ES
> version, we put it to the front, so it will be matched first.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+rene...@verge.net.au>
> Tested-by: Nguyen Viet Dung <dung.nguyen...@renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c 
> b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c
> index a02fab89e25e..4b275225aa9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac.c
> @@ -272,12 +272,15 @@ static const struct tmio_mmc_dma_ops 
> renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_dma_ops = {
>   * implementation as others may use a different implementation.
>   */
>  static const struct soc_device_attribute gen3_soc_whitelist[] = {
> +     /* specific ones */
>          { .soc_id = "r8a7795", .revision = "ES1.*",
>         .data = (void *)BIT(SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC_ONE_RX_ONLY) },
> -        { .soc_id = "r8a7795", .revision = "ES2.0" },
>          { .soc_id = "r8a7796", .revision = "ES1.0",
>         .data = (void *)BIT(SDHI_INTERNAL_DMAC_ONE_RX_ONLY) },
> -        { .soc_id = "r8a77995", .revision = "ES1.0" },
> +     /* generic ones */
> +        { .soc_id = "r8a7795" },
> +        { .soc_id = "r8a7796" },
> +        { .soc_id = "r8a77995" },

   Could you use a tab for indentation of the new lines?
Actually, it was on my TODO list (before the patch adding R8A77980 to the white
list)...

>          { /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  

MBR, Sergei

Reply via email to