On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote:
I'm about to gut the RT latency tracer with the version I'm pushing
upstream. This will be some of the changes:
Might I request that you follow the mainline stabilization model and
wait until the 2.6.25-rcX-rtY series to make a significant change
This may sound strange, but we have a Pentium M system running
2.6.20-rt5 that fails to boot all the way (fails at spawning mingetty
- then various strange behaviors) when the system is at -10 degrees C
or less. Oddly, it works fine if we used *unpatched* Linux. My only
guess can be that there
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:22:39PM +0100, Markus Mathes wrote:
Hi, there!
I have installed the RT_PREEMPT patch v2.6.23.11-rt4 and now try to verify
my installation. Therefore I used cyclictest with clock_nanosleep and
clock_monotonic options for 5-50 threads. The results are shown below:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 00:59 +0100, Dragan Noveski wrote:
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
PCI: If a device doesn't work, try pci=routeirq. If it helps, post
a report
at least this part is ACPI message and it an old message , nothing to
worry about
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rt1 tree, which can be
downloaded from the location:
http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
Information on the RT patch can be found at:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
Changes since 2.6.24-rc8-rt1
- ported to 2.6.24
to build a 2.6.24-rt1
Hi, there!
I have installed the RT_PREEMPT patch v2.6.23.11-rt4 and now try to
verify my installation. Therefore I used cyclictest with clock_nanosleep
and clock_monotonic options for 5-50 threads. The results are shown below:
#Threads Minimum (microsec) Average (microsec) Maximum
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm about to gut the RT latency tracer with the version I'm pushing
upstream. This will be some of the changes:
Might I request that you follow the mainline stabilization model and
wait until the 2.6.25-rcX-rtY series to make a significant change like
