Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2011-05-12 10:08:06, Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch remvoes mach-s5p6442 directory for ARCH_S5P6442 in arch/arm.
Why remove it? No users? Broken? ...?
Hmm...do you want to keep it in upcoming mainline?
Actually, it works fine current mainline on smdk6442. Of
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
HI,
Hi,
why do you remove it?
Thanks for your concerns :)
I think it's rather premature to decide it at this time.
So this is dropped at this moment...but as a note, I will implement this
into other samsung stuff next time :)
Thanks.
Best
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
Hi :)
On Friday, May 13, 2011 2:56 PM Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 04:11:07 Kukjin Kim wrote:
This patch remvoes mach-s5pc100 directory for ARCH_S5PC100 in
arch/arm.
Hm, what's the point of removing this code?
May I also ask
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:15 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Shouldn't there be some deprecation period for whole s5pc100 support
removal ?
This is that. But I know, there is no time...
It looks a bit rude to me that suddenly whole support for
On 12:36 Wed 18 May , Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:44:03PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
HI,
Hi,
why do you remove it?
Thanks for your concerns :)
I think it's rather premature to decide it at this time.
Em 11-05-2011 22:11, Kukjin Kim escreveu:
According to removing ARCH_S5PC100, we don't need to support
fimc for S5PC100.
NACK
There's nothing mentioning the removal of ARCH_S5PC100 or the
corresponding bits at feature-removal-schedule.txt:
$ grep -i s5pc100
