On 01/22/2012 10:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:48:36PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 01/22/2012 06:27 PM, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>
>>> I for one would rather see in-kernel drivers that require it, and then
>
>> In fact we have to deal with the opposite now, as some e
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:21:48PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Documentation/SubmittingPatches please...
> I should have stated explicitly that purpose of this patch (I should
> have called it sniplet) was to show my point only.
> IMHO it's stil
On 01/23/2012 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:50:22PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
Aren't these fixed? i.e. - is it really needed to configure these
either by platform data or DT at all?
[1]
From 5cfba526210bc596c7d14e33fea93648baa0a227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fro
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c | 85
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij
--
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> irq 0 now means no irq, so get rid of this unnecessary initializer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-common.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Linus Wall
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Convert ux500 to use the new amba_device_alloc APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-nomadik/board-nhk8815.c | 17 -
> arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c | 9 ++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
1 files change
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Russell King
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-nomadik/board-nhk8815.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:50:22PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> Aren't these fixed? i.e. - is it really needed to configure these
> either by platform data or DT at all?
>
>
> [1]
>
> From 5cfba526210bc596c7d14e33fea93648baa0a227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Karol Lewandowski
Documen
On 12.01.2012 08:35, Thomas Abraham wrote:
Hi!
Add device tree based discovery support for max8997.
+static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev,
+ struct max8997_platform_data *pdata)
+{
...
+ pdata->regulators = rdata;
+
Hi,
please also get and inclue Acks from the Exynos maintainer for the next
post.
Since I have a compiling config for exynos now I will merge the patches
when you have the Acks and addressed or explained the issues I pointed
out below.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:26:08PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
This is an outline of the plan for this cycle, up to the next merge
window, agreed between Olof and myself.
As Nicolas' idle changes weren't merged before the last merge window
opened, we have decided that Nicolas will resubmit his changes after
-rc1 (in other words, now) and they will be merged i
This patch fixes the following build issue, which happens only if SMP
has been disabled:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `exynos4_pm_resume':
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c:387: undefined reference to `scu_enable'
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/ar
14 matches
Mail list logo
