On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 21:40 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> W dniu 06.11.2015 o 20:11, Sjoerd Simons pisze:
> > When a transfer completes there is a small window between the
> > descriptor
> > being unset as the current active one in the thread and it being
> > marked
> > as done. This causes
On 09.11.2015 22:12, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 21:40 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> W dniu 06.11.2015 o 20:11, Sjoerd Simons pisze:
>>> When a transfer completes there is a small window between the
>>> descriptor
>>> being unset as the current active one in the thread and
Hello Tobias,
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:47:13 +0100
Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Hello Hyungwon,
>
>
> Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think this patch should update .gitignore, not for adding the
> > built binary to untracked file list.
> Thanks!
>
>
> >
Hello Tobias,
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:47:02 +0100
Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Hello Hyungwon,
>
>
> Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> > Hello Tobias,
> >
> > I was in vacation last week, so I could run your code today. I found
> > that what g2d_move() does is actually copying
On Monday 09 November 2015 22:09:26 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thursday 17 September 2015 23:19:40 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > C libraries with 64-bit time_t use an incompatible format for
> > struct omap3isp_stat_data. This changes the kernel code to
> >
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 17 September 2015 23:19:40 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> C libraries with 64-bit time_t use an incompatible format for
> struct omap3isp_stat_data. This changes the kernel code to
> support either version, by moving over the normal handling
> to the 64-bit
Hello Hyungwon,
Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> I was in vacation last week, so I could run your code today. I found
> that what g2d_move() does is actually copying not moving, because the
> operation does not clear the previous area.
I choose g2d_move() because we also have memcpy()
Hello Hyungwon,
Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think this patch should update .gitignore, not for adding the built
> binary to untracked file list.
good point. I should do this for the event test as well I guess.
Going to respin the series.
With best wishes,
Tobias
> But without it,
On 9 November 2015 at 09:47, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Hello Hyungwon,
>
> Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think this patch should update .gitignore, not for adding the built
>> binary to untracked file list.
> good point. I should do this for the event test as