On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:40:17PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> The above two don't seem to have been in the branch that was sent by
> Kukjin, it had:
> ARM: EXYNOS: Invert VCLK polarity for framebuffer on ORIGEN
> ARM: S3C64XX: Fix interrupt configuration for PCA935x on Cragganmore
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
> Hi Olof,
>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mark Brown
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes i
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Olof,
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mark Brown
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> >> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes in a separate
> branch?
> >
> > Here's some of them, there were a few
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes in a separate branch?
>
> Here's some of them, there were a few others I'm aware of that depended
> on feature updates.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:50:54AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I would also prefer if people stopped having their own trees included
> > in next, but I know that I'm sometimes slow to pick up patches that
> I also have to admit, as teg
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you
>> more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch
>> things up and I wonder if that's making it a it
On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you
> more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch
> things up and I wonder if that's making it a it easier for things to end
> up dropping on the floor if a time base
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
[...]
> What I would do myself is that if I hadn't seen the patches land in
> the topmost staging tree by -rc6 or -rc7, I would ping the owner of
> the tree that the patches are sitting in to make sure they go up.
Would be helpful to us.
> Hopefully this kind of thing w
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:11:54AM -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
[...]
> > This really is very disappointing.
>
> No it isn't.
>
> What is really disappointing is the lack of responsive maintainers for the
> Samsung stuff. It took _two_ bloody months to get the
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:13:54PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > That sounds like it'd be helpful overall but it's something that has to
>> > be sorted out at the maintainer level. I'm guess
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:13:54PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That sounds like it'd be helpful overall but it's something that has to
> > be sorted out at the maintainer level. I'm guessing there's not really
> > much that contributors can do h
On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > So, is there anything that people like me who are contributing to rather
> > > than maintaining things can do to help here beyond cha
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > So, is there anything that people like me who are contributing to rather
> > > than maintaining things can do to help here beyond chasing main
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > So, is there anything that people like me who are contributing to rather
> > than maintaining things can do to help here beyond chasing maintainers?
> Maybe the Samsung maintainer(s) should
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> So, is there anything that people like me who are contributing to rather
> than maintaining things can do to help here beyond chasing maintainers?
>
> Generally my process is roughly to monitor what goes into -next and
> chase people if things don't make i
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:06:35AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:11:54AM -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This really is very disappointing.
> No it isn't.
I think we're talking at cross purposes here - I'm saying that this
whole situation is disappointing, not
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:11:54AM -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:56:34PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Of course we will take all bug fixes. Just rebase the rest on top of 3.3-rc1
> > and we can take it right away for 3.4.
>
> I've sent a pull request earlier in the th
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:58:39AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 08:49:53PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That'd be extremely disappointing, especially given that there's some
> > bug fixes in there for updates going in this merge window without which
> > mainline
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:56:34PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Of course we will take all bug fixes. Just rebase the rest on top of 3.3-rc1
> and we can take it right away for 3.4.
I've sent a pull request earlier in the thread for the main ones I'm
aware of (which are mostly fixes for things i
On Monday 09 January 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> In my opinion, as you know, it would be better to us if you could send this in
> this merge window.
> Actually, it does not have any dependency with others, in addition, for a long
> time this has been included in linux-next for this
> merge window.
Y
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 08:49:53PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
> > > ?git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > > next-samsung-devel-samsung
>
> > Thanks
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes in a separate branch?
Here's some of them, there were a few others I'm aware of that depended
on feature updates. Ideally we'd actually get all the changes that have
been in -nex
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Mark Brown
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
>> >> > ?git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Mark Brown
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> >> > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
> >> > ?git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> >> > next-samsung-
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
>> > ?git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>> > next-samsung-devel-samsung
>
>> Thanks. I've pulled
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
> > ?git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > next-samsung-devel-samsung
> Thanks. I've pulled this into late/devel, based on earlier email from
> Arnd we
Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > next-samsung-devel-samsung
> >
> > It is including s3c64xx cpuidle and developme
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> next-samsung-devel-samsung
>
> It is including s3c64xx cpuidle and development for Cragganmore, ORIGEN and
> some boa
Hi Arnd,
Please pull Samsung devel for v3.3 from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
next-samsung-devel-samsung
It is including s3c64xx cpuidle and development for Cragganmore, ORIGEN and
some boards.
If any problems, please let me know.
Thanks.
Best regards
29 matches
Mail list logo
