On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:00:10PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Mark, I'm holding on Padma's changes for Samsung audio.
If any updates about this from your side?
Is it ok to send current next/audio-samsung in my tree to upstream for v3.8?
They didn't seem to have broken anything in -next for
Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:33:43AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
I checked Samsung audio driver stuff just now. If you don't mind, I will
drop the patch 48a2050d (ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary
variable)
instead of applying this.
That works just as well for me,
Commit 48a2050d36f0da5a7d22e3bd7dbf3bf8a5a538bc (ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete
the unnecessary variable) removed the src_clk field from the platform
data header for the I2S driver without a corresponding change having
been made in the I2S driver to stop using the field, causing build
breaks.
This change
Mark Brown wrote:
Commit 48a2050d36f0da5a7d22e3bd7dbf3bf8a5a538bc (ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete
the unnecessary variable) removed the src_clk field from the platform
data header for the I2S driver without a corresponding change having
been made in the I2S driver to stop using the field, causing
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:33:43AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
I checked Samsung audio driver stuff just now. If you don't mind, I will
drop the patch 48a2050d (ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary variable)
instead of applying this.
That works just as well for me, thanks. Padma, as I said in
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:33:43AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
I checked Samsung audio driver stuff just now. If you don't mind, I will
drop the patch 48a2050d (ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary variable)
