Hi Doug, Olof,
On Wednesday 08 of May 2013 12:33:34 Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
wrote:
Olof,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Seems like this should be selected by the SoC
Tomasz / Olof,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
Nothing stops you from doing that on your own. I tend to push back
onto the maintainers to get them engaged in their own housekeeping,
but anyone is free to :)
I will probably leave this to the maintainers at
Doug Anderson wrote:
Tomasz / Olof,
Hi Doug, Tomasz and Olof
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
Nothing stops you from doing that on your own. I tend to push back
onto the maintainers to get them engaged in their own housekeeping,
but anyone is free
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
If you've got MACH_EXYNOS5_DT but not MACH_EXYNOS4_DT you'll be
missing the pincontrol definitions. Add them for exynos5.
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2
Olof,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Seems like this should be selected by the SoC (ARCH_EXYNOS5) instead
of the board. Actually, I'm not sure we need the board Kconfig entry
long-term; all boards will be dt-only.
Good point. Hopefully someone at
Hi,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Olof,
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Seems like this should be selected by the SoC (ARCH_EXYNOS5) instead
of the board. Actually, I'm not sure we need the board Kconfig
