Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, June 09, 2014 11:51:42 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --fYgRtaZIy+F1uhp1 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:22:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, June 09, 2014 08:49:17 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Yes,

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:22:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, June 09, 2014 08:49:17 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, looks like it is. > But it doesn't apply for me on top of the current Linus' tree. > Can you please rebase? It probably depends on other people's trees too, I jus

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, June 09, 2014 08:49:17 PM Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:15:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, June 06, 2014 02:08:50 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Yes, the conversion to make ARCH_HAS_OPP unused is in Raphael's tree for > > > the merge window. > > > Per

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:15:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 06, 2014 02:08:50 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > Yes, the conversion to make ARCH_HAS_OPP unused is in Raphael's tree for > > the merge window. > Perhaps already merged? Yes, looks like it is. signature.asc Descript

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Mark Brown > > Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be > directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and > requiring architectures to enable it explicitly the ARCH_HAS_OPP symbol > has beco

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-08 Thread Shawn Guo
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Mark Brown > > Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be > directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and > requiring architectures to enable it explicitly the ARCH_HAS_OPP symbol

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, June 06, 2014 02:08:50 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --cU9XODsizZBnwgll > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:50:06PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:14:01PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > > I'm

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:50:06PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:14:01PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > I'm not sure about the expected merge order for this kind of change vs > > queued up stuff in the renesas git tree, but I believe the following > > patch selects ARCH_HA

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 06/06/2014 05:36 AM, Mark Brown wrote: [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig > index 0ba4826..524b027 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig > @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ config ARCH_OMAP3 > bool "TI OMAP3" > depe

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Mark Brown > > Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be > directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and > requiring architectures to enable it explicitly the ARCH_HAS_OPP symbol > has beco

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:14:01PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Simon Horman wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> >> From: Mark Brown >> >> >> >> Since the OPP layer is a k

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:14:01PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >> From: Mark Brown > >> > >> Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be > >> directly s

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> From: Mark Brown >> >> Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be >> directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and >> requiring arc

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Mark Brown > > Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be > directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and > requiring architectures to enable it explicitly the ARCH_HAS_OPP symbol

[PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP

2014-06-06 Thread Mark Brown
From: Mark Brown Since the OPP layer is a kernel library which has been converted to be directly selectable by its callers rather than user selectable and requiring architectures to enable it explicitly the ARCH_HAS_OPP symbol has become redundant and can be removed. Do so. Signed-off-by: Mark B