On 17.11.2015 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them t
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to
> >> pick
> >> it up (at least for the tim
On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
>> it up (at least for the time being).
>
> Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
Sure
On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> it up (at least for the time being).
Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:26:43 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
> is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
> which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
> checking for secti
s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
checking for section mismatches:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in
