On 31 January 2013 21:42, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 21:37, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hmm. Now as I think of it, there might be another confusing aspect:
>>
>> Could you explain what "sw coordination" and "any coordination" mean?
>> I mean specifically cpufreq_policy.cpus and cpufreq_po
On 31 January 2013 21:37, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hmm. Now as I think of it, there might be another confusing aspect:
>
> Could you explain what "sw coordination" and "any coordination" mean?
> I mean specifically cpufreq_policy.cpus and cpufreq_policy.related_cpus
> masks.
Check this out:
https://
On Thursday 31 of January 2013 20:46:10 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 20:34, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Well, the fact that it isn't used at the moment doesn't mean that it
> > shouldn't be set correctly. The field is present in the structure and
> > has a set of defined values - one of whi
On 31 January 2013 20:34, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Well, the fact that it isn't used at the moment doesn't mean that it
> shouldn't be set correctly. The field is present in the structure and has
> a set of defined values - one of which should be selected. For example,
> I can imagine some governor ta
On Thursday 31 of January 2013 20:22:50 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 20:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 of January 2013 09:50:37 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> > + policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;
> >>
> >> I couldn't understand the use of this change.
On 31 January 2013 20:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 31 of January 2013 09:50:37 Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > + policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;
>> I couldn't understand the use of this change. Can you please explain ?
>
> All cores on Exynos SoCs share the same cloc
Hi Viresh,
On Thursday 31 of January 2013 09:50:37 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so changing
> > frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.
> >
> > This patch modifies the exynos-cpuf
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so changing
> frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.
>
> This patch modifies the exynos-cpufreq driver to inform cpufreq core
> about this behavior and broadcast frequency cha
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:23:02 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Wednesday 21 of November 2012 21:47:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 02:52:26 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 13 of November 2012 10:26:12 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > On Exynos S
Hi Rafael,
On Wednesday 21 of November 2012 21:47:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 02:52:26 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 of November 2012 10:26:12 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so
> > > changing
> > > fre
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 02:52:26 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 of November 2012 10:26:12 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so changing
> > frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.
> >
> > This patch modifies the exynos-cpufreq
On Tuesday 13 of November 2012 10:26:12 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so changing
> frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.
>
> This patch modifies the exynos-cpufreq driver to inform cpufreq core
> about this behavior and broadcast freque
On Exynos SoCs all cores share the same frequency setting, so changing
frequency of one core will affect rest of cores.
This patch modifies the exynos-cpufreq driver to inform cpufreq core
about this behavior and broadcast frequency change notifications for all
cores.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
13 matches
Mail list logo
