Re: [PATCH 0/2] These two patches to s3c_pm_arch_prepare_irqs() were part of the work

Kukjin, On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Applied with 1st one, BTW, do you want to send this for stable tree? I don't have any need for it to be in stable tree. The ARM Chromebook hasn't reached critical functionality on any released/upstram Linux

RE: [PATCH 0/2] These two patches to s3c_pm_arch_prepare_irqs() were part of the work

Doug Anderson wrote: to make suspend/resume reliable on the ARM Chromebook (exynos5250-snow). A few more details: - The first patch is not strictly needed but was a nice cleanup. Our understanding was that EINT0 was originally turned on for exynos evt0 silicon and not needed for

RE: [PATCH 0/2] These two patches to s3c_pm_arch_prepare_irqs() were part of the work

Kukjin Kim wrote: Doug Anderson wrote: to make suspend/resume reliable on the ARM Chromebook (exynos5250-snow). A few more details: - The first patch is not strictly needed but was a nice cleanup. Our understanding was that EINT0 was originally turned on for exynos evt0

[PATCH 0/2] These two patches to s3c_pm_arch_prepare_irqs() were part of the work

to make suspend/resume reliable on the ARM Chromebook (exynos5250-snow). A few more details: - The first patch is not strictly needed but was a nice cleanup. Our understanding was that EINT0 was originally turned on for exynos evt0 silicon and not needed for evt1. - The second patch is more