Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-s3c2410: Leave the bus disabled unless it is in use

2014-02-07 Thread Naveen Krishna Ch
Hello Wolfram, Sorry for a replying after really long time. On 24 January 2013 17:50, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:35:34AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >> From: Simon Glass >> >> There is a rather odd feature of the exynos i2c controller that if it >> is left enabl

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-s3c2410: Leave the bus disabled unless it is in use

2013-01-24 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:35:34AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > From: Simon Glass > > There is a rather odd feature of the exynos i2c controller that if it > is left enabled, it can lock itself up with the clk line held low. > This makes the bus unusable. > > Unfortunately, the s3c24

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-s3c2410: Leave the bus disabled unless it is in use

2013-01-07 Thread Naveen Krishna Ch
On 29 November 2012 20:14, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park I don't see this patch landed any where in linux-i2c tree, Though it was acked. Was it missed or should i be doing something for this to be merged ?? > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi > wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-s3c2410: Leave the bus disabled unless it is in use

2012-11-29 Thread Kyungmin Park
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > From: Simon Glass > > There is a rather odd feature of the exynos i2c controller that if it > is left enabled, it can lock itself up with the clk line held low. > This makes the bus unusable. > > Unfortun

[PATCH 1/2] i2c-s3c2410: Leave the bus disabled unless it is in use

2012-11-28 Thread Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
From: Simon Glass There is a rather odd feature of the exynos i2c controller that if it is left enabled, it can lock itself up with the clk line held low. This makes the bus unusable. Unfortunately, the s3c24xx_i2c_set_master() function does not notice this, and reports a timeout. From then on t