On 07/11/2013 03:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:47:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:57:30PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/11/2013 03:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:47:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM
Hi,
On Wednesday 17 of July 2013 14:31:23 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:57:30PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/11/2013 03:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:47:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM,
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 02:57:30 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/11/2013 03:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:47:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel
Hi,
On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:47:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as
On 06/29/2013 12:47 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 28 of June 2013 23:47:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting
On 06/29/2013 01:07 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Saturday 29 of June 2013 00:27:04 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 07:31 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 28 of June 2013 13:20:09 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
The kernel is not a playground where you can upstream code and then
remove it
On 06/27/2013 08:10 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:36:12 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2013 12:13 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
AFTR mode support was introduced by commit 67173ca (ARM: EXYNOS: Add
support AFTR mode on EXYNOS4210) in v3.4 kernel.
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before Bartlomiej.
Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013 11:57:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/27/2013 08:10 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:36:12 PM Daniel Lezcano
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before Bartlomiej.
Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013 11:57:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/27/2013 08:10 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before Bartlomiej.
Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013 11:57:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/27/2013 08:10 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On
Hi Lorenzo,
On Friday 28 of June 2013 12:13:33 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before
Bartlomiej. Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before Bartlomiej.
Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013 11:57:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On
On Friday 28 of June 2013 13:20:09 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before
Bartlomiej. Let me share my thoughts on this.
On Friday 28 of June 2013 11:57:25 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well, before Bartlomiej.
Let me share my thoughts on this.
[ ... ]
On 06/28/2013 07:31 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 28 of June 2013 13:20:09 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
The kernel is not a playground where you can upstream code and then
remove it because a feature seems broken and you don't have an idea of
why.
Well, first of all, it has not been
On Friday 28 of June 2013 23:47:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:27 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Friday, June 28, 2013 01:20:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've been fighting with this whole AFTR state as well,
On Saturday 29 of June 2013 00:27:04 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2013 07:31 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 28 of June 2013 13:20:09 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
The kernel is not a playground where you can upstream code and then
remove it because a feature seems broken and you
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:36:12 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/26/2013 12:13 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
AFTR mode support was introduced by commit 67173ca (ARM: EXYNOS: Add
support AFTR mode on EXYNOS4210) in v3.4 kernel. Unfortunately even
in v3.4 kernel it hasn't worked as
AFTR mode support was introduced by commit 67173ca (ARM: EXYNOS: Add
support AFTR mode on EXYNOS4210) in v3.4 kernel. Unfortunately even
in v3.4 kernel it hasn't worked as supposed and this is still the case
with v3.10-rc6 (it probably wasn't noticed because CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is
not turned on by
On 06/26/2013 12:13 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
AFTR mode support was introduced by commit 67173ca (ARM: EXYNOS: Add
support AFTR mode on EXYNOS4210) in v3.4 kernel. Unfortunately even
in v3.4 kernel it hasn't worked as supposed and this is still the case
with v3.10-rc6 (it probably
21 matches
Mail list logo