Hi Alim,
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > W dniu 09.10.2015 o 01:45, Alim Akhtar pisze:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> wrote:
> >>> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error
> >>> e
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> W dniu 09.10.2015 o 01:45, Alim Akhtar pisze:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>>> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
>>> would still disable it.
W dniu 09.10.2015 o 01:45, Alim Akhtar pisze:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
>> would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of
>> regulator enable/disable.
>>
>
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
> would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of
> regulator enable/disable.
>
Do you see a regulator unbalanced reported here during boot
During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of
regulator enable/disable.
The patch moves code for getting and enabling the regulator from
exynos_map_dt_data() to probe function because it is really not a part