Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:58:12PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Looks good to me, but there is no '{ I2C_BOARD_INFO(wlf-gf-module,
0x20) },' in my tree.
Just adding address 0x22 stuff is enough now?
Yes, it is - sorry, context diff for another project.
OK, no problem.
Mark Brown wrote:
We now have an additional classs of modules which are enumerated at I2C
address 0x22. Add hookup for these modules.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:58:12PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Looks good to me, but there is no '{ I2C_BOARD_INFO(wlf-gf-module, 0x20)
},' in my tree.
Just adding address 0x22 stuff is enough now?
Yes, it is - sorry, context diff for another project.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
We now have an additional classs of modules which are enumerated at I2C
address 0x22. Add hookup for these modules.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
