Hi Olof,
On Saturday 05 of January 2013 14:57:54 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
wrote:
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4
SoCs.
Ah, this answers my question from the previous patch. So, why do 5450
as
Hi Kukjin,
On Wednesday 02 of January 2013 16:20:23 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
Cc: Thomas Abraham thomas...@samsung.com
Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
Cc: Thomas Abraham thomas...@samsung.com
Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Signed-off-by:
Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
wrote:
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
Ah, this answers my question from the previous patch. So, why do 5450
as a separate patch?
OK, let me create one patch
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
Ah, this answers my question from the previous patch. So, why do 5450
as a separate patch?
diff --git
Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
Cc: Thomas Abraham thomas...@samsung.com
Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
---
