Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 05:52:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The glue around the core designware IP is significantly
different between the Exynos and i.MX implementation,
which is reflected in the DT bindings.
This changes
On Monday, March 31, 2014 at 11:28:29 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 05:52:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The glue around the core designware IP is significantly
different between the Exynos and i.MX
Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Monday, March 31, 2014 at 11:28:29 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 05:52:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The glue around the core designware IP is
On Monday, March 31, 2014 at 12:38:01 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Monday, March 31, 2014 at 11:28:29 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 05:52:53 PM,
On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 05:52:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The glue around the core designware IP is significantly
different between the Exynos and i.MX implementation,
which is reflected in the DT bindings.
This changes the i.MX6 binding to reuse as much as
possible from the common
The glue around the core designware IP is significantly
different between the Exynos and i.MX implementation,
which is reflected in the DT bindings.
This changes the i.MX6 binding to reuse as much as
possible from the common designware binding and
removes old cruft.
I removed the optional GPIOs
