On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ajay,
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right direction, but
Hi Thierry,
On Monday 22 September 2014 09:40:38 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:29:13AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On Monday 22 September 2014 09:40:38 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at
Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch tries to seperate
Before the introduction of the component framework I would have said this is
the way to go. Now, I think bridges should register themselves as components,
and the DRM master driver should use the component framework to get a
reference to the bridges it needs.
Well, I have modified the bridge
Hi Ajay,
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Ajay Kumar
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Ajay,
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
A set of helper functions are
Hi Javier,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
jav...@dowhile0.org wrote:
Hello Ajay,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry
Hello Ajay,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ajay kumar ajayn...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you plan to address Thierry's concerns and re-spin this patch?
Same question for patches:
drm/bridge: Add i2c based driver for ptn3460 bridge
drm/bridge: Add i2c based driver for ps8622/ps8625 bridge
Yes,
Hello Ajay,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
I think it should even be possible to do this in
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
I think it should even be possible to do this in more separate steps.
For example you could add the new bridge infrastructure without touching
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
A set of helper functions are defined in this patch to make
bridge driver probe independent of the drm flow.
The bridge devices
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
A set of helper functions are defined in this patch
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:01:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:01:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
This patch
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
A set of helper functions are defined in this patch to make
bridge driver probe independent of the drm flow.
The bridge devices register themselves on a lookup table
when they get probed by
17 matches
Mail list logo
