Hello Mark,
On 07/20/2015 12:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Lee,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 07/20/2015 10:10 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:28:07PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 07/20/2015 12:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
This PMIC uses a single I2C address for all the regulators and these are
controlled by writing to different I2C register addresses. So the regulator
nodes don't
Hello Mark,
On 07/27/2015 12:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:28:07PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 07/20/2015 12:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
This PMIC uses a single I2C address for all the regulators and these are
controlled by writing to different
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated. But the max77686 DT binding doc still suggest to use it
instead of the regulator node name's which is the correct approach.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez
Hello Lee,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 07/20/2015 10:10 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated. But the max77686 DT binding doc still suggest to use it
instead of the
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated. But the max77686 DT binding doc still suggest to use it
instead of the regulator node name's which is the correct approach.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@osg.samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof
