Javier,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
The regulator framework has a set of helpers functions to be used when
the system is entering and leaving from suspend but these are not called
on Exynos platforms. This means that the
[adding Chris Zong as cc who posted a similar patch for Rockchip]
Hello Doug,
On 10/20/2014 06:26 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Javier,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
The regulator framework has a set of helpers functions to be
Javier,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
It turns out that regulator_suspend_finish() actually returns an error
code. Could you print a warning if you see it?
Yes, I noticed this when looking at Chris patch for Rockchip but
[adding Rafael Wysocki to cc as Suspend-to-RAM maintainer]
On 10/20/2014 07:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Javier,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
It turns out that regulator_suspend_finish() actually returns an error
code.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 10/20/2014 07:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
I guess I was just trying to follow the suggestion that was in the
regulator code:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/regulator/core.c#L3699
that says This
Hello Mark,
On 10/20/2014 09:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 10/20/2014 07:36 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
I guess I was just trying to follow the suggestion that was in the
regulator code:
The regulator framework has a set of helpers functions to be used when
the system is entering and leaving from suspend but these are not called
on Exynos platforms. This means that the .set_suspend_* function handlers
defined by regulator drivers are not called when the system is suspended.
