Hi,
On 01.11.2013 20:58, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 14 of October 2013 19:08:23 Vyacheslav Tyrtov wrote:
From: Tarek Dakhran
The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran
Signed-off-by
Hi,
On Monday 14 of October 2013 19:08:23 Vyacheslav Tyrtov wrote:
> From: Tarek Dakhran
>
> The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
> using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran
> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov
> ---
> .../
Nevermind, didn't read the clk-pll.c properly..
pll_35xx and pl_2550 will default to the same code.
Best Regards,
Mauro
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Mauro Ribeiro wrote:
> Is the PLL35xx driver compatible with the ones used on 5410?
>
> +static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5410_plls[nr_pll
Is the PLL35xx driver compatible with the ones used on 5410?
+static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5410_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
+ [apll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_APLL, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
+ APLL_CON0, NULL),
+ [cpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_CPLL, "fo
Quoting Vyacheslav Tyrtov (2013-10-14 08:08:23)
> From: Tarek Dakhran
>
> The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
> using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran
> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov
Looks good to me. Any objections
From: Tarek Dakhran
The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt | 37 +++
drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile