[PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

The ePAR standard says that: the name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model. So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic node name instead of using the chip's name. Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

Hello. On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: The ePAR standard says that: the name of a node should be somewhat ePAPR. generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model. So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

Hello Sergei, On 07/17/2015 11:11 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: The ePAR standard says that: the name of a node should be somewhat ePAPR. Thanks for pointing it out. I guess that Lee can fix the typo when applying?